The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all, lemay replied admiral chester nimitz, commander in chief of the pacific fleet, sent out the following public statement : the atomic bomb played no decisive part , from a purely military standpoint, in the defeat of japan [emphasis added]. During world war ii, american physicists and engineers began a race against nazi germany to develop the first atomic bomb their secret endeavor, which lasted from 1942 to 1945, was known as the manhattan project the project led to the invention of nuclear weapons, including two that were dropped. The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all no invasion was necessary the vice chairman of the us bombing survey paul nitze wrote: i concluded that even without the atomic bomb, japan was likely to surrender in a matter of months.
A test explosion from april 1954 is shown in this photo from the us defense department on aug 6, 1945, the us dropped the first atomic bomb on hiroshima, japan, hastening the end of world. Bomb supporters argue that, although this destruction is distasteful by post-war sensibilities, it had become the norm long before president truman took office, and the atomic bomb was just one more weapon in the arsenal to be employed under this policy. A huge expanse of ruins left by the explosion of the atomic bomb on aug 6, 1945 in hiroshima drop the bomb — and even our ww ii military icons knew it and that dropping the bomb was.
The notion that leahy objected to the atomic bomb on ethical grounds is a distortion of a conversation he had with truman after being notified of the deci sion to use the bomb (leahy was. In recent years, many academics and others have condemned president truman's decision to use the atomic bomb on the japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki as unnecessary and immoral yet this interpretation relies on a poor understanding of history that both lacks perspective and ignores context. Essay on the dropping of atomic bomb on japan on august 6, 1945, a b-29 bomber named enola gay dropped an atomic bomb, on hiroshima, japan hiroshima had been almost eradicated with an estimated 70 - 80 thousand people killed three days later, a second, more powerful bomb was dropped on the. In later years, these people viewed the atomic bomb as unnecessary because they thought that if the allies simply continued their firebombing raids on japan and establishing a blockade, then the war was as good as won for the allies.
The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand japanese but this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative the destruction of hiroshima and nagasaki put an end to the japanese war. The atomic bomb is indeed a fearsome weapon, but it was not the cause of japan's surrender, even though the myth persists even to this day in a trenchant new book, the decision to drop the atomic bomb (praeger, 1996), historian dennis d wainstock concludes that the bombings were not only unnecessary, but were based on a vengeful policy that actually harmed american interests. In contrast, many us leaders, particularly those closest to the fight against japan, believed the use of the atomic bomb was unnecessary, that japan was on the verge of surrender without it. On august 8, 1945, after the atomic bombing of hiroshima, hoover wrote to army and navy journal publisher colonel john callan o'laughlin, the use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate. This month marks the 70th anniversary of the atomic bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki and with each passing year the historical record is ever clearer that dropping the a-bombs was unnecessary.
President obama's visit to hiroshima, nearly 71 years after it was destroyed by the first atomic bomb, inevitably raises once again the questions of why the united states dropped that bomb. He further stated that the first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment and that it was a mistake to ever drop it the scientists involved with the manhattan project even wrote to the secretary of defense to try to encourage him not to drop the bomb. The atomic bomb accomplished truman's primary objective the attack on hiroshima finally convinced hirohito that the war must end, and his long-delayed conclusion was the decisive step in bringing. [barton j bernstein, a professor of history at stanford university, has written extensively on the history of the a-bomb he wrote this article for perspective] during his white house tenure.
The bombing of hiroshima was one of the pivotal events of the twentieth century, yet this controversial question remains unresolved at the time, general dwight eisenhower, general douglas macarthur, and chief of staff admiral william leahy all agreed that an atomic attack on japanese cities was unnecessary. He further stated, the first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment it was a mistake to ever drop it ( source ) he said this despite the fact that most prominent scientists were completely against it. Before anyone gets upset and rages at me for having an opinion that classes with their own, i have been assigned to write an essay on why the dropping of the bomb on hiroshima was unnecessary, regardless of what my own opinion is.